Skip to main content

AOTA Code of Ethics

For the past few days my classmates and I have been learning about the AOTA Code of Ethics and what each of the six different standards means.  Some of the regulations seem to me to be no-brainers, such as the one saying that health care providers should always refrain from doing harm to a client.  Intentionally hurting another human being seems like the opposite of what you are supposed to do as an OT.  Another of the codes, Autonomy, states that each individual has a right to what information of theirs is disclosed and that clinicians should refrain from posting information about clients on social media -- again, common sense.  Honestly, all of the codes seem to me to be pretty cut and dry, until you come to a situation where a 16-year-old pregnant girl asks you not to tell her mother about her pregnancy.  Uh oh!  When reading the descriptions of each of the rules, certain themes keep emerging: respect, honesty, fairness. On the surface, these seem pretty easy ideals to follow, but who is measuring these standards?  I'm not referring to the legislative side of this, but what I am asking is by whose standards are we basing something as being respectful, honest or fair?  The man that mistreats women but obeys his mother's every whim may view himself as being respectful, but is he actually a respectful person?  Going back to the situation with the clinician and the pregnant teenager, would keeping information about the pregnancy from the mother violate the honesty standard?  If the clinician told the mother that her daughter was pregnant, honesty might be upheld, but what about fairness to the daughter?  I guess my point through all of this is that there can and should be standards set in place to guide how we as practitioners conduct our services, and these standards can help facilitate the overall quality of services.  Nonetheless, the underlying motivations of clinicians ought to be one inspired by the desire to help others.  How can you truly provide quality services to others if all you care about is upholding standards or getting paid at the end of the week?  I firmly believe our desires to refrain from disclosing personal information about clients should be because we truly want what is best for others not because we have to follow the rules in order to keep a job.  If the only reason you are not intentionally hurting clients is due to required regulations in order to keep your job, then you should not be in the health care profession at all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stephen Hawking

Today we talked about Stephen Hawking, renown scientist and lecturer, and his fight with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).  The incredible thing about him is that while he now is completely dependent on the help of others, he is still pursuing his passion of writing, science and speaking.  While he is dependent on a tracheotomy for breathing functions and cannot actually speak, he has found ways to communicate and live life to the fullest.  In fact, Assistive Technology (AT) has helped him to communicate by use of cheek movements in selecting words and phrases on a computer.  Even though his AT has helped, Hawking's therapy should focus on continued effort to find the most advanced AT and adaptive equipment so that his continued loss of function will not impede his ability to pursue his desires and interests.  Goals for OT involve training caregivers on how to us AT, discovering new techniques and methods to incorporate in his daily life, and helping him to f...

Chucky Mullins

Chucky Mullins was a college football player who suffered a spinal cord injury in the cervical injury resulting in his loss of functioning in all four limbs.  Mullins went from a life of complete independence and success as a college athlete to complete dependence and reliance on caregivers.  After his injury he struggled with speaking and swallowing due to a medical trachea.  He hoped to still be able to attend college and get a degree. Occupational therapy services in this situation should be focused on adaptation in order to facilitate activity in meaningful occupations.  While his arms were unable to move, he still had neck and head control that could be used with adaptive equipment in operating a computer.  His intervention services should be focused on capitalizing on the movement he does have through the use of creative and innovative strategies.  Mullins may not be able to regain the ability to walk, but he definitely can return to the pursuit of a...

Adapting the Practice of OT

The beautiful thing about occupational therapy as a profession is its adaptability.  It thrives in an environment that is multi-dimensional where the profession morphs according to the client.  "Client-centered" and "top-down approach" are all key terms when describing OT.  Instead of being a rigid process with little adaptation, the profession molds into the best fit for each specific client. Occupational therapists are more than just practitioners.  In a way, OTs are detectives, teachers, and companions.  One theory that capitalizes on the adaptability of OT is Frame of Reference (FoR).  FoR implements the strengths of OT by allowing the practitioner's roles to adapt to each individual client. Using the client's FoR aids the therapist to develop an intervention that best suites his specific needs.  This is where solving mysteries and applying reasoning to the situation is useful.  Deducing the client's motivations and context are key in the deve...