For the past few days my classmates and I have been learning about the AOTA Code of Ethics and what each of the six different standards means. Some of the regulations seem to me to be no-brainers, such as the one saying that health care providers should always refrain from doing harm to a client. Intentionally hurting another human being seems like the opposite of what you are supposed to do as an OT. Another of the codes, Autonomy, states that each individual has a right to what information of theirs is disclosed and that clinicians should refrain from posting information about clients on social media -- again, common sense. Honestly, all of the codes seem to me to be pretty cut and dry, until you come to a situation where a 16-year-old pregnant girl asks you not to tell her mother about her pregnancy. Uh oh! When reading the descriptions of each of the rules, certain themes keep emerging: respect, honesty, fairness. On the surface, these seem pretty easy ideals to follow, but who is measuring these standards? I'm not referring to the legislative side of this, but what I am asking is by whose standards are we basing something as being respectful, honest or fair? The man that mistreats women but obeys his mother's every whim may view himself as being respectful, but is he actually a respectful person? Going back to the situation with the clinician and the pregnant teenager, would keeping information about the pregnancy from the mother violate the honesty standard? If the clinician told the mother that her daughter was pregnant, honesty might be upheld, but what about fairness to the daughter? I guess my point through all of this is that there can and should be standards set in place to guide how we as practitioners conduct our services, and these standards can help facilitate the overall quality of services. Nonetheless, the underlying motivations of clinicians ought to be one inspired by the desire to help others. How can you truly provide quality services to others if all you care about is upholding standards or getting paid at the end of the week? I firmly believe our desires to refrain from disclosing personal information about clients should be because we truly want what is best for others not because we have to follow the rules in order to keep a job. If the only reason you are not intentionally hurting clients is due to required regulations in order to keep your job, then you should not be in the health care profession at all.
Something I have been accustomed to growing up are the phrases "shake it off" or "suck it up" after falling down or sustaining an injury. Having grown up in a family where there were many children to support on a tight budget, I understood the fact that a hospital visit was the last resort. Undoubtedly this has facilitated my understanding that you shrug it off and move on. To a certain extent, I agree with this ideal. However, after learning the extreme results of certain injuries and their lifelong effects, I may have my future child's doctor on speed dial! Something that continued to bother me during the story of nurse, Dawn Pereda, was the fact that her own facility where she worked sent her home after she sustained a severe head injury. It wasn't until hours after alarming symptoms began to appear that she was screened for an injury. By this point, it was too late. Now life relies on a schedule that must be maintained or she will not be able to
Comments
Post a Comment